The gloves are off on this 12 months’s revival of Bitcoin’s 2010 OP_RETURN struggle.
Weeks right into a heated deadlock, the chief of the progressive motion searching for to ease knowledge storage limits on Bitcoin Core mempools has distributed with mental arguments, and underhanded rhetoric masquerading as a safety warning has gone viral.
Antoine Poinsot of Chaincode Labs, the originator of pull request (PR) 32359 to extend OP_RETURN’s datacarrier restrict from 83 to tons of of hundreds of bytes, blames his opponent as having “troubles with reality,” “intentionally misleading” with “lies,” and “actively making s*** up.”
Chaincode and similarly-minded Brink builders assume that Bitcoin’s hottest queue of transactions ought to relay massive OP_RETURN outputs that include knowledge irrelevant to the motion of BTC.
In the meantime, conservatives discover this accommodative coverage preposterous, tantamount to a subversion of Bitcoin’s goal by company pursuits.
Luke Dashjr, a number one conservative searching for to retain and even tighten OP_RETURN’s 83-byte filter within the OP_RETURN struggle, can be bored with pleasantries.
Dashjr is asking his opposition “spam apologists,” “corrupt,” “scammers,” and “bad actors.” He additionally blamed Poinsot for “gaslighting,” and accused a Bitcoin Core developer of deliberately hacking one in every of his code repositories.
Learn extra: Bitcoin nodes protesting OP_RETURN change hit all-time excessive
Bitcoin OP_RETURN conservatives activate Knots nodes
In a sign of opposition, conservatives are downloading and syncing Knots full nodes to the Bitcoin community. Versus Bitcoin Core maintainers’ intention to lift the OP_RETURN datacarrier cap, Knots’ maintainer Dashjr intends to retain the cap.
Knots nodes have greater than doubled in Might. Certainly, by Sunday, Knots had rallied to an all-time excessive of 8.3% of public nodes.
In an try to discourage Knots operators, a thread about safety vulnerabilities went viral over the weekend.
It highlighted Dashjr as its sole maintainer, his “terrible security track record,” and its similarity to Bitcoin Core — particularly in accepting OP_RETURN transactions inside legitimate blocks.
The thread, merely claiming that utilizing Knots will “harm your fee estimation,” conveniently omitted the effectiveness of over 15 years of Bitcoin’s 83-byte-or-lower OP_RETURN datacarrier for Bitcoin Core’s default mempool.
Certainly, Bitcoin Core’s 83-byte restrict on mempool relays has prevented OP_RETURN outputs exceeding 83 bytes from 99% of all mined transactions since Bitcoin’s creation.
Obtained a tip? Ship us an electronic mail securely by way of Protos Leaks. For extra knowledgeable information, observe us on X, Bluesky, and Google Information, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.